Quantcast

Southern West Virginia News

Saturday, September 21, 2024

Miller, Scalise, Colleagues File Amicus Brief Supporting President Trump's Colorado Ballot Disqualification Appeal

Webp vgpefpbjgyeaxvq5w9intxyjcltv

Rep. Carol Miller, U.S. Representative for West Virginia 1st District | Official U.S. House headshot

Rep. Carol Miller, U.S. Representative for West Virginia 1st District | Official U.S. House headshot

Congresswoman Carol Miller, House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, and several Republican lawmakers have filed an amicus brief in support of former President Donald Trump's appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. The appeal challenges the decision of the Colorado Supreme Court to disqualify Trump from the Colorado Presidential Ballot. The amicus brief, signed by 135 House Republicans and 42 Senate Republicans, urges the Supreme Court to reverse the Colorado court's ruling.

In a statement, Congresswoman Miller expressed her frustration with the actions of the Democrats, saying, "Americans, not judges, elect the President of the United States. It’s pathetic that Democrats will go to extreme lengths to interfere with our election process." Miller also highlighted the attempt to silence those who have different opinions, stating, "President Trump is the frontrunner to be the Republican candidate on the 2024 Presidential ballot, and this an obvious attempt by the left to silence Americans who think differently from them."

House Majority Leader Steve Scalise criticized President Biden and his allies for undermining the democratic process. He stated, "Not only does the Colorado Supreme Court have no authority to remove President Trump from the ballot in the 2024 presidential election, but the broad and ill-defined justifications they use can easily be abused in the future to block political opponents from assuming office." Scalise emphasized the danger of setting a precedent that takes away people's choice and subverts the will of the American people.

The amicus brief argues that the Colorado Supreme Court's opinion infringes on the prerogatives of members of Congress. It contends that the court disregarded textual and structural limitations that aim to ensure Congress's control over the enforcement and removal of a president from office. The brief also criticizes the court for adopting a "malleable and expansive view of 'engage in insurrection,'" which could lead to widespread abuse against political opponents.

The lawmakers are urging the U.S. Supreme Court to carefully consider their arguments and reverse the decision made by the Colorado Supreme Court. They believe that the court's ruling sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the democratic process.

The full amicus brief can be viewed by clicking on the provided link.

This case, Trump v. Anderson, is a significant one as it involves whether Donald Trump should remain on the ballot in Colorado as the frontrunner for the Republican Party's presidential candidate. The outcome of this appeal will have implications for the upcoming 2024 presidential election.

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

!RECEIVE ALERTS

The next time we write about any of these orgs, we’ll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.
Sign-up

DONATE

Help support the Metric Media Foundation's mission to restore community based news.
Donate

MORE NEWS